Grand Master Repeal Rule 3

Most Worshipful Grand Master:

Florida Masonic ScandalWith all due personal and Masonic respect, in the spirit of Masonic “due and timely notice,” I feel compelled to address your Ruling and Decision No. 3, of 2012. While your ruling is unique to the Florida Jurisdiction, it has stirred a major controversy; adverse to the peace and harmony amongst regular Freemasons, beyond your Jurisdiction.

As a particular case in point, it was thoroughly, passionately and constructively discussed at my most recent Lodge meeting. It is also currently scheduled to be discussed in at least one other Lodge in the Seattle area, which I’m aware of. None present at my Lodge’s most recent meeting indicated any magnitude of agreement with your position, as expressed in your Ruling and Decision No. 3. However, one of the points of the discussion was whether or not it was appropriate to advocate that the Washington Grand Lodge remove its recognition of the Florida Grand Lodge.

In the spirit of Freemasonry, and in hope of contributing to the healing of any controversy surrounding your Ruling and Decision No. 3, I respectfully request that you seriously consider the following viewpoints:

1.Your ruling clearly cites the “Landmarks” submitted by Dr. Albert Mackey; which, in their entirety, did not actively serve Freemasonry when they were written. Nor have these “Landmarks” been at all widely accepted, to any appreciable degree, by Freemasons as the basis for Masonic Jurisprudence; unique Masonic Code coincidence excepted.

2.If “Mackey’s Landmarks” (25) are to be the basis for strict modern Masonic jurisprudence, it is academic that they must be considered in their entirety. Such would be unacceptable, just by virtue of their assertion that any Grandmaster is entitled to make “Masons at site.”

3.If followed, “Mackey’s Landmarks” – and your Ruling and Decision No. 3 – regarding religion, would by extension, imply the necessary exclusion of those, amongst others, of the Jewish faith; while accepting those of the Islamic following – with a predictable accompanying furor, however irrational such may be. Certainly, the expense and monetary consequences of potential civil litigation need to be considered; add the predictable PR damage to the Masonic fraternity.

4.If continued, your Ruling and Decision No. 3 is clearly and logically destined to force a ‘comparative review’ of the Christian religion, in general; with potentially damaging viewpoints and associated consequences – to ultimately be associated with not only “Freemasonry,” but your personal legacy as a Grandmaster. Just within the confines of Freemasonry, any such exchanges are overwhelmingly unconscionable, particularly having been instigated by a Masonic Grandmaster, inadvertently or otherwise.

5.Additionally, your Ruling and Decision No. 3 sends the clearly implied message that the Masonic doors and Lodge rooms are open to liars; while punishing members of integrity and honesty. Worse, fearing an unpredictable ‘purge, a significant percentage of members of any Florida Lodge would find it instantly compelling to resort to dishonesty; as the easiest resolution to a clearly distasteful ruling – with a consequent and enduring distrust of the Florida Grand Lodge, per se.

6.I would also encourage you to consider the potential for your Ruling and Decision No. 3 also being locally viewed and noted as a personal violation of the Florida Jurisdiction’s Master Masons’ Obligation, prohibiting any act which would wrong either a Lodge or an individual Master Mason; regardless of whether or not Masonic charges are asserted.

Accordingly, in the interest of Masonic peace and harmony, I implore you to withdraw your Ruling and Decision No. 3.

Fraternally and Respectfully,
Ralph W. Omholt P.M.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Visit Our Sponsor

About Fred Milliken

Fred is a Past Master of Plymouth Lodge, Plymouth Massachusetts, and Past Master of Paul Revere Lodge, Brockton, Massachusetts. Presently, he is a member of Pride of Mt. Pisgah No. 135, Prince Hall Texas, where is he is also a Prince Hall Knight Templar . Fred is a Fellow of the Phylaxis Society and former Executive Director of the Phoenix Masonry website and museum.

Comments

  1. Robert G says:

    The word on the masonic street here in Florida is that the decree will indeed be repealed. Grand Lodge meets at the end of May. Everyone should be hearing about it shortly thereafter.

  2. I certainly hope so Robert. Not that the ruling affects me personally, but it has made me question my willingness to be associated with such a thing. They say a man shows his character by those he associates with. This is not a ruling I agree with or believe is in the best interests of the craft. It goes against everything I was told about religious freedom/tolerance when joining.

  3. I’m hearing good things in Florida as well.

  4. Lazarus says:

    As a sitting Master in a Florida lodge, I can tell you this topic is getting attention, and action. 2 weeks from yesterday it should be over and done with. Jorge Aladro has been a great leader in many regards, however, he missed the boat on this one, and I believe he knows it. unfortunantly, pride has reared its ugly head and won’t allow him to back down. We’ll see what RW:. Danny Griffith has to say about it.

  5. I’ve just been informed that R&D3 has been revoked at Grand Lodge by Vote of the Craft.

  6. Lazarus says:

    yes, it was indeed put to bed by the craft yesterday morning. I’m glad to have raised my hand in that vote. It also rescended all the suspensions, resignations, and trial comissions leveled by said R&D. It was a great day for Florida Masonry as other fantastic legislation was passed as well. Florida Masonry is back on track my brothers. Next year we will be submitting legislation to change our Digest of Law so that we may ask the Union Grand Lodge of Fl, PHA, to extend recognition. As it sits right now, we cannot ansk another GL for Recognition, they have to ask us. That attitude of superiority will be coming to and end soon enough.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: