I take great wisdom from Albert Pike. When taken in portion, his writings in Morals and Dogma strike me almost a prophecy along the lines of Nostradamus or the Oracles of Delphi. It was in a deep reading of his work on the third degree that I found the passages below.
In navigating his writing in his Magnum Opus under the third degree, these gems of political observation ring true today probably more than they did in the nearly 150 years ago. I was at once shocked with a twinge of amusement that Pike foresaw perhaps the situation within which we find ourselves today. And in his writing he looks to Masonry as part of the remedy for it, but with his own cryptic warning about looking to the society of builders.
It was a problem America, and the world perhaps, is faced with today which is that those in charge are “possessed by the devil of commercial avarice” which he describes as being the point when “a nation becomes possessed with a spirit of commercial greed, beyond those just and fair limits set by a due regard to a moderate and reasonable degree of general and individual prosperity.”
Pike delves the subject deeply, without the realization that what he would write about could (or would) be happening. But, in the subtext of his work, maybe he saw that it could happen.
When the thirst for wealth becomes general, it will be sought for as well dishonestly as honestly; by frauds and overreaching, by the knaveries of trade, the heartlessness of greedy speculation, by gambling in stocks and commodities that soon demoralize a whole community. Men will speculate upon the needs of their neighbors and the distresses of their country. Bubbles that, bursting, impoverish multitudes, will be blown up by cunning knavery, with stupid credulity as its assistants and instrument. Huge bankruptcies, that startle a country like the earth-quakes, and are more fatal, fraudulent assignments, engulfment of the savings of the poor, expansions and collapses of the currency, the crash of banks, the depreciation of Government securities, prey on the savings of self-denial, and trouble with their depredations the first nourishment of infancy and the last sands of life, and fill with inmates the churchyards and lunatic asylums. But the sharper and speculator thrives and fattens. If his country is fighting by a levy en mass for her very existence, he aids her by depreciating her paper, so that he may accumulate fabulous amounts with little outlay. If his neighbor is distressed, he buys his property for a song. If he administers upon an estate, it turns out insolvent, and the orphans are paupers. If his bank explodes, he is found to have taken care of himself in time. Society worships its paper-and-credit kings, as the old Hindus and Egyptians worshiped their worthless idols, and often the most obsequiously when in actual solid wealth they are the veriest paupers. No wonder men think there ought to be another world, in which the injustices of this may be atoned for, when they see the friends of ruined families begging the wealthy sharpers to give alms to prevent the orphaned victims from starving, until they may find ways of supporting themselves.
This seems to be speak directly to the efforts of the Occupy Wall Street protestors in New York, and now around the country over the “heartlessness of greedy speculation, by gambling in stocks and commodities…” who have “ruined families.” Has anyone questioned the patriotism and loyalties of the companies and banks that continue to benefit while those whom they prey continue to inch into “distress?”
Pike goes on to say:
We should naturally suppose that a nation in distress would take counsel with the wisest of its sons. But, on the contrary, great men seem never so scarce as when they are most needed, and small men never so bold to insist on infesting place, as when mediocrity and incapable pretense and sophomoric greenness, and showy and sprightly incompetency are most dangerous.
Like a call for action, Pike declares the need for the Masonic principles saying:
So much the more necessity for Masonry!
War has not ceased; still there are battles and sieges. Homes are still unhappy, and tears and anger and spite make hells where there should be heavens. So much the more necessity for Masonry! So much wider the field of its labors! So much the more need for it to begin to be true to itself, to revive from its asphyxia, to repent of its apostasy to its true creed!
So how does Masonry fit into this troubling world? As a Master Mason, it is the lesson of the third degree itself, Pike says:
Masonry seeks to be this beneficent, unambitious, disinterested guide; and it is the very condition of all great structures that the sound of the hammer and the clink of the trowel should be always heard in some part of the building. With faith in man, hope for the future of humanity, loving-kindness for our fellows, Masonry and the Mason must always work and teach.
We have to step back a bit to see Pike’s concern about this responsibility when he talks about Faith, Hope, and Charity saying:
These forces are within the reach of all men; and an association of men, actuated by them, ought to exercise an immense power in the world. If Masonry does not, it is because she has ceased to possess them.
An association of men? Masonry perhaps?
Interesting food for thought.
Let’s say I’m an evil banker. My goal is to take as much money as possible from “the poor.” What’s my best course of action? Would you think it wise for me to give quarter million dollar loans to people with no verifiable income to purchase a home? Clearly that would only cause me to be evil and unemployed.
Unless the government offers to secure those loans for me! Then I wouldn’t have to worry about “the poor” loosing their income or buying more than they could afford. Now whether I partake of such a program is a matter of moral rectitude, however, let’s also add another factor: I’m being compelled to make such loans by the same government that will also secure the loans.
It’s at this point that any association of moral, upright men should take it upon themselves to upend this government because it is involved in the most heinous of thefts: inflation. A government that intends such a program will essentially be inflating its money supply, which means that for the poorest of society, their (very) hard earned dollars no longer buy the necessities that they need.
Of course, upending governments is something Masonry is not involved in. We should stand idly by and watch from the sidelines as our great country is spent into oblivion.
My Brother, Its the Silent Majority that prevails, the sectret ballot that is destroying our
American way, is the same tool that will bring us back to reaity. Keep the faith, fight in
silence, but make our selves felt with our proper ballot. Help those that will politically
rule again. Use the emails, help financially to those that will honestly work our way out.
Though the First and Second Temples were destroyed, The Third will rise again, this, by
the efforts of the present day Builders. The Spirit of Hiram will pull us through.
Brother Jack – you have shown that you do not comprehend what happened on most of these NINJA loans:
Would you think it wise for me to give quarter million dollar loans to people with no verifiable income to purchase a home? Clearly that would only cause me to be evil and unemployed.
Loan originators did not keep the loans which they made to those unable to afford them. They packaged those loans as securities, and sold them off to investment banks – they were not secured by the government.
Making such a loan WOULD make you rich, as soon as you sell it off – you have made approximately 1% of the loan value (amortized it comes out to $576,889.46, assuming 5% fixed rate over 30 years, nothing down, .5 PMI, and 1.25% property tax) in origination fees = over $5500 dollars on the first transaction, not to mention what you’ll get from the company to whom you sell the loan.
Please, don’t buy into the hype that greedy evil bankers would never take these risks unless they had government backing – they didn’t. A majority of the sub-prime loans which were made were by banks that had little federal oversight. A majority of the loans originated by bank which were subject to the Community Reinvestment Act (which is what you seem to be blaming with the claims that bankers were forced to give loans to the undeserving) were, in fact, doing well.
I’m being compelled to make such loans by the same government that will also secure the loans.
No, no, no, and no.