BRYCE ON HISTORY
How Masonry affected America.
I have been a Freemason for many years and I am still surprised by those people who believe the Masons have a secret agenda in terms of manipulating the country or stockpiling incredible amounts of wealth. Heck, we have trouble organizing a picnic. However, there is reasonable evidence to show Masons were involved with the founding of the country. For example, of the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence, 9 were Masons (16%), and of the 39 men who signed the U.S. Constitution 13 were Masons (33%). Of the 44 presidents we have had, 14 were Masons (32%) with the last one being Gerald Ford. Beyond this, few people outside of the fraternity truly understand the impact of Masonry in America.
I participate in a book club whereby we have been studying the history of the United States, from the Revolutionary War to today where we are studying the Reconstruction period following the Civil War. Throughout these books, there is mention of the various founding fathers who were Masons. Inevitably, I am asked about their Masonic heritage. For example, in the book, “Benjamin Franklin: An American Life,” by Walter Isaacson, the author mentions Franklin’s Masonic background, but it was obvious to me he didn’t comprehend the fraternity’s influence on Franklin. Our acclaimed inventor, author, printer, ambassador, and postmaster was raised a Master Mason at St. John’s Lodge of Philadelphia in 1731, and become the Provincial Grand Master of Pennsylvania three short years later in 1734. Franklin was considered to be America’s top scientist and intimate with American politics. He is the only founding father to sign the three most important documents of the time: the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Treaty of Paris (thereby ending the Revolutionary War).
In 1771, Franklin visited Ireland and Scotland. During this time, his hosts were surprised by how well he was received by the people. What they didn’t realize, nor Isaacson, was Franklin was not just a respected scientist, but was also well known in the Masonic community who embraced “the age of enlightenment” which opened many doors for him.
In the late 1770’s, Franklin was appointed the first United States Ambassador to France. Again, he was warmly welcomed by “enlightened” Masons. So much so, he joined Loge des Neuf Soeurs in Paris, and became the Master of the Lodge in 1779. His influence was great and, as such, he helped initiate the great French philosopher Voltaire into the fraternity, among others. Freemasonry at this time was very much concerned with discussing philosophical and scientific subjects, and questioned everything. Theoretically, it is still supposed to be this way today but it has turned more into a social club as opposed to discussing “enlightenment.” Nonetheless, Franklin’s Masonic background proved useful in forging relationships with Europe and ending the war.
The “Father of our Country,” George Washington, was raised a Master Mason in Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4 A.F.& A.M., VA, in 1752. It is said he had a high regard for the fraternity due to its sense of “enlightenment” and order. However, due to his commitments as General and President, Washington could not afford to spend much time attending Lodge.
In 1787 Washington was elected to preside over the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia which devised the U.S. Constitution and thereby our government. Washington was elected primarily due to his prestige, but his Masonic heritage, with a keen sense or order and protocol, certainly helped. Keep in mind, the discussions and votes were kept secret until the conclusion of the convention which lasted approximately four months (May 25th – Sept 17th). This is a testament to Washington’s ability to run a meeting.
Just because Masons observe protocol, it doesn’t mean they always get along.
Nothing more vividly exemplifies this than the relationship between President Andrew Jackson and Senator Henry Clay (who had also served as Speaker of the House, and Secretary of State). Both men served as Grand Masters of their respective states, Clay in Kentucky in 1820, and Jackson in neighboring Tennessee in 1822. In government though, they were political opposites and detested each other. Jackson was a member of the Democratic Party and Clay’s roots began in the Whig party (which would eventually evolve into the Republican party). The two men seemed to disagree on just about everything. In the presidential contest of 1832, incumbent Jackson trounced Clay. When Jackson refused to renew the charter of the Second Bank of the United States, Clay passed a resolution to censure Jackson, a tremendous embarrassment to the president. This caused Jackson to call Clay, “reckless and as full of fury as a drunken man in a brothel.” On his last day as President, Jackson is said to admit that one of his regrets was that he “had been unable to shoot Henry Clay…”
There may have been no love lost between Jackson and Clay, yet they respected each other as Masons, which may have ultimately been the reason why Jackson never acted on his regrets. As an aside, Clay was a member of Lexington Lodge No. 1 F.& A.M. in Kentucky and Jackson was raised at Harmony Lodge No. 1 F.& A.M. in Nashville, Tennessee.
Unlike Clay and Jackson, perhaps the strongest bond between political leaders was between President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Great Britain’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill during World War II. FDR was raised a Master Mason at Holland Lodge No. 8 F.& A.M. in New York in 1911. As a career politician he had limited time for Masonic activities but there is strong evidence he supported the fraternity, such as having his three sons initiated into it and becoming an honorary Grand Master of the Order of DeMolay, a Masonic youth organization. Churchill’s ancestry included many Masons and he became a Master Mason at Studholme Lodge No. 1591 in 1901. Like FDR, his political career kept him from actively participating in Masonic activities, but he maintained his affiliation.
As the war began, Great Britain was essentially alone and isolated. The country desperately needed the resources and assistance of the United States. On August 9th, 1941, prior to America entering the war, the two leaders met secretly in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland. Churchill arrived on the HMS Prince of Wales and met Roosevelt aboard the USS Augusta. The two had met during World War I when FDR was the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, and Churchill as Lord of the Admiralty, a loftier position. Churchill had forgotten the meeting, which slightly perturbed Roosevelt, but years later as Prime Minister he desperately needed to know the President. Freemasonry was an important connection as it established the values both men possessed. When meeting FDR aboard the USS Augusta, Churchill gave FDR what appears to be a Masonic handshake thereby denoting their relationship. With such common values, the men were able to speak “on the level,” and form a strong bond which was helpful in forging the Atlantic Charter.
I am certainly not suggesting Freemasonry was the principal influence motivating these men of history, but it certainly didn’t hurt. It taught them about building relationships based on common values, protocols, and the search for “enlightenment.” There are many other stories of how Freemasonry helped to shape America, such as my article on, “Montana 3-7-77 – How Freemasonry Tamed a Territory.” However, as I delve into the history books I am appalled by how Freemasonry is shrugged off as an irrelevant aspect of history. It may not have the significance as purported by anti-Masonic conspirators, but it did have an important role to play in forging relationships. I just wish historians would pay closer attention to how Masonry influences the lives of people.
Keep the Faith!
More Masonic History.
Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.
Copyright © 2015 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.
Good article, although I disagree on a broader level. History may understate our role. However, I think Freemasons (myself included) are guilty of consistently overstating the Craft’s role in history and in the qualities of a particular man. We are quick to give (or at least imply) Freemasonry primary, if not exclusive, credit when we recognize an element of the Craft in a Brother’s deeds or character.
Yes, perhaps GW’s role as a Mason educated him on meeting protocol, but it ignores his training as a military officer, an entrepreneur, and a vestryman and churchwarden. We cannot claim or imply that he ran a good meeting because he was a Mason. For all we know, his Lodge may have required little or no skills of its leaders, and the Secretary really ran the show. We can’t definitely take credit for “protocol” skills.
Jackson did not necessarily shoot Clay because of the “mutual respect” they had as Brothers. Maybe it was his larger and innate sense of morality and aversion to murder? Crediting this action (or lack of action) to their status as Brothers is quite a stretch, and a study of the level of acrimony these two shared reveals very little “Masonic” qualities.
The Churchill-FDR relationship is a case of cherry-picking a relationship with a good quality our outcome and ascribing the quality/outcome to Masonry, at least in part. Implying that Freemasonry has an important role in events such as the Atlantic Charter because the Craft was “an important connection as it established the values both men possessed” is a wild overstatement, as if Freemasonry was the sole or most important character development process that either man went through.
Freemasonry teaches many important lessons, some of which may be “deeper” than common understanding. However, mutual respect, professionalism, protocol, acting “on the level,” and, in general, just being a good person–these are aspirations inculcated through many of society’s institutions. Slapping a “Freemasonic” label on a good trait does not mean it was the origin of or reason for the good trait.
Men often do good because they are good men, not because they are Freemasons. Credit the man, not the Craft. Credit the Craft for bringing good men together, but not for all of the good they do.
Jack – Thanks for your comments. As I mentioned, more than anything, Freemasonry is useful for establishing relationships. Knowing how desperate the UK was for US resources, I would assume Churchill would use anything to gain FDR as an ally, including the use of a token. I have studied the video of the two meeting aboard the USS Augusta. Although one cannot be 100% sure, it does appear Churchill slips the grip to FDR.
It is incorrect to say that George Washington was initiated, passed and raised in Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4. Rather, Washington was initiated, passed and raised in the Lodge at Fredericksburg. His degrees were conferred between November 1752 and August 1753. At the time of Washington’s admission to the lodge, it was not “Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4,” but was known simply as “the Lodge at Fredericksburg.” It was not a chartered lodge, and so it could have no number, much less a number that old, because at that time, the only entities that might have issued it a warrant or charter, the grand lodges in England, Ireland and Scotland, already had many more lodges than four. The Lodge at Fredericksburg was formed without dispensation, warrant or charter under the immemorial right of Masons to meet, form lodges and confer degrees. The lodge did later seek a warrant from the Grand Lodge of Scotland, which it received, and that warrant was dated 21 July 1758. About 20 years later, at the formation of the Grand Lodge of Virginia, that new grand lodge assigned it the number “4.”
Thanks Pete. For more information on Fredericksburg Lodge see:
http://masoniclodge4.org/index.php/history/history-of-lodge-no-4
Great podcast and very well presented. Thank you and I look forward to more.
Pingback: 10 Intriguing Masonic Connections To The Founding Of America – QS Daily