Freemasonry has long been a subject of debate regarding its compatibility with Christianity, particularly in the context of fundamentalist Christian movements like Christian Nationalism. As a fraternal organization with deep historical roots and a belief system that emphasizes moral development, Freemasonry presents a unique challenge to some branches of Christianity that assert exclusivity of salvation and theological interpretation.
Read: Can Modern Freemasonry Survive Under Christian Nationalism?
The Core Conflict: Theology and Universality
One of the fundamental theological issues between Freemasonry and fundamentalist Christianity, including Christian Nationalism, lies in universality. Freemasonry, as many critics have pointed out, promotes religious inclusivism. It accepts members from various faiths, each praying to their conception of God. Freemasonry refers to God as the “Great Architect of the Universe,” allowing for interpretations across religions. This inclusivity is seen as directly conflicting with Christian Nationalist views, which often hold that Christianity—particularly conservative or fundamentalist interpretations—is the only true path to salvation.
For example, the Southern Baptist Convention’s 1993 report highlighted that Freemasonry’s teachings on salvation, morality, and its religious inclusiveness are at odds with Christian doctrine. The report argued that Freemasonry’s multireligious stance does not align with Christianity’s exclusive claim to salvation through Jesus Christ. Christian critics, like those from the Assemblies of God and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, also argue that Freemasonry’s practices border on idolatry and promote universalism, both of which are deemed heretical in their doctrines.
Read: Christian Nationalism and the Future of Freemasonry: Navigating Uncertain Terrain
Moreover, Freemasonry’s emphasis on moral self-improvement and the ability to achieve spiritual enlightenment is seen by some Christian groups as promoting a “works-based” approach to salvation, contrary to the Christian belief in salvation by grace alone. The idea that one can work their way into salvation through good deeds, as implied by Masonic teachings, clashes with the core Christian doctrine of salvation through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9).
Freemasonry Under Christian Nationalism: Three Potential Futures
Given these theological conflicts, the future of Freemasonry in a Christian Nationalist society could unfold in several ways:
Marginalization and Restriction In a future where Christian Nationalism gains more influence, Freemasonry could face increased marginalization. Historically, the Catholic Church, along with many Protestant denominations, has condemned Freemasonry due to its religious pluralism and secretive rituals. For instance, the Catholic Church has been vocal in its opposition, citing Freemasonry’s indifferentism—the belief that all religions are equally valid—as inherently incompatible with Catholic doctrine. In such a political and cultural climate, Freemasonry may face legal and social restrictions, similar to how it was persecuted under authoritarian regimes, such as in Nazi Germany, where it was banned for its supposed subversive and secretive nature.
Christian Nationalist governments, if they were to rise, might follow suit in suppressing Freemasonry, especially as it stands in contrast to the idea of a singular Christian nation. Public pressure from religious groups, restrictions on civic participation, and possible legislative actions could make it increasingly difficult for Freemasons to practice or hold leadership positions in society openly.
Read: Freemasonry In The Face Of Modern Fascism: Challenges, Resistance, And Survival
Coexistence with Restrictions A second possibility is that Freemasonry could continue to exist in a more limited, socially constrained form. Some Christian denominations, such as the Southern Baptist Convention, have taken a more moderate approach, suggesting that individual Christians should decide whether Freemasonry aligns with their faith. However, as Christian Nationalist ideologies strengthen, this freedom may become more restricted. Freemasons might be allowed to practice but with certain limitations, such as prohibitions on holding public office or operating charitable organizations linked to Masonic lodges.
In this scenario, Freemasonry would continue its tradition of philanthropy and brotherhood but under increased scrutiny. Its members might be viewed with suspicion by dominant Christian groups, leading to a less visible role in public life. The emphasis on secrecy and universalism would remain points of contention. Still, some accommodation might be found if Masonic lodges adapted their practices or public messaging to align more closely with dominant Christian norms.
Reformation and Reconciliation Finally, a third possibility is that Freemasonry could undergo a form of reformation to make it more palatable to Christian Nationalist values. Historically, Freemasonry has shown adaptability to different social and political environments, and it could alter its practices to minimize conflict with Christian orthodoxy. This could involve emphasizing Freemasonry’s moral and charitable aspects while downplaying or eliminating elements that Christian Nationalists find problematic, such as universalism or the secrecy of rituals.
This reformation could lead to Freemasonry aligning more closely with a Christian ethical framework, particularly one emphasizing community service, charity, and personal morality. Such a transformation would likely require a renegotiation of Freemasonry’s core values. Still, it could result in a more harmonious coexistence with Christian Nationalism, albeit at the expense of its traditional inclusivism and universalist philosophy.
Tensions and Resilience
In conclusion, the relationship between Freemasonry and fundamental Christianity, especially in the context of a rising Christian Nationalism, is fraught with tension. While Freemasonry emphasizes inclusivity and moral development, its universalist approach to religion conflicts with the exclusivist nature of Christian Nationalist ideologies. Whether Freemasonry is marginalized, restricted, or undergoes significant changes to adapt to these pressures will depend on the extent to which Christian Nationalism shapes the political and cultural landscape in the future.
As history shows, Freemasonry has survived in various forms under different political regimes, but its compatibility with a Christian Nationalist vision of society remains a complex and contentious issue.
Sources:
- Christian Research Institute (www.equip.org)
- Catholic Culture (www.catholicculture.org)
- The Gospel Coalition (www.thegospelcoalition.org)
.What deeply worries me in the three scenario’s is that these do not in any
way address a fourth and far more important possibility, namely resist.
The writer sketches a freemasonry of docility and acceptance. This is a
perspective of cowardly surrender.
What I would prefer is for freemasonry to stand up and take issue. This
would imply a course of non-acceptance and active resistance, in the
courts, in the halls of the polis, in the PTA’s, in the universities, in
city councils, in parliament.
This better way would be to create an agora where free minds meet,
inviting others to join, using the constitution to confront a Christian
nationalism that is fundamentalist. Now could well be the time that those
of feeble spine remain silent, in effect denying the high ideals of
brotherhood i.e. humanism. But brothers with enough Zivil Courage to
engage the fundamentalists will join and maybe even lead and inspire the
undoubtedly counter-movements that will arise.
So, we shall have to leave our temples and to take up the weapons of our
ideals. We must never surrender.
Karel Musch
Master Mason
Lodge De Rechte Verhouding no. 250
Netherlands